| Evaluation Guides | ||
|
|
Download this document as a printable Adobe Acrobat pdf file. Table of Contents Energy Efficiency Program Evaluation Guides by National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency and the Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy There are several documents available that explain energy efficiency program evaluation and provide guidance on how to conduct impact evaluations of efficiency programs in the United States. The goal of this "Guide to the Guides" is to clarify the relationships among the documents. It focuses on documents with a national scope, particularly the DOE/EERE's Impact Evaluation Framework for Technology Deployment Programs and the National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency's Model Energy Efficiency Program Impact Evaluation Guide, two important national-level documents about energy efficiency program impact evaluation that were released in 2007. This "Guide to the Guides" also identifies other evaluation guides written for particular regions or states that may have broader implications, and other useful documents and resources related to evaluation. The Impact Evaluation Framework for Technology Deployment Programs and the Model Energy Efficiency Program Impact Evaluation Guideare complementary in their approaches and scope, and together provide a fairly comprehensive overview of impact evaluation for all types of program approaches. The Impact Evaluation Framework for Technology Deployment Programs uses the term "technology deployment programs" instead of "energy efficiency programs." This can be confusing to anyone focusing on the administration or evaluation of ratepayer-funded efficiency programs. This term is used because the document is meant to provide guidance on evaluating clean energy programs and renewables programs as well as efficiency programs. For efficiency program evaluation purposes, however, this language can simply be interpreted as "energy efficiency programs." The Impact Evaluation Framework for Technology Deployment Programs is based on the premise that "identifying the linkages between outputs and outcomes"—that is, how what the program does (its activities or "outputs") are translated by partners and target audiences into actions that produce a variety of impacts or "outcomes," including but not limited to energy and demand impacts—"is one of the most critical and most difficult problems in program evaluation." [1] To help managers and evaluators address this problem, it provides specific tools to use in identifying the linkages between program activities or outputs and the resulting impacts or outcomes. Identifying these linkages helps to clarify and prioritize what should be measured in the evaluation, thus enabling evaluators to apply with greater effectiveness the more technically oriented measurement and analysis tools presented in guides such as the Model Energy Efficiency Program Impact Evaluation Guide. The identification of outputs, outcomes, and the linkages among them also helps to separate program-induced impacts from the same effects that may be generated by other factors. The ability to separate program-induced impacts from other factors will become increasingly important as more players enter the field in which ratepayer funded energy efficiency programs used to play alone, offering messages, programs, or services designed to reduce energy use for a variety of different reasons. The Model Energy Efficiency Program Impact Evaluation Guide provides technical guidance for calculating energy and demand savings and avoided emissions from energy efficiency programs via a set of practical processes and methodologies. It focuses on evaluation specifically for program approaches relying primarily on direct energy savings. It lays out clearly the steps involved in selecting the appropriate measurement and analysis approach for the program and evaluation goals. This includes, but may not be limited to, the use of billing analysis, deemed savings, and project- or facility-level data collection, monitoring and analysis (M&V). It also provides important context and background for implementing the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP) as part of evaluation. It provides some basic approaches to including limited market effects measurement in impact evaluation for the calculation of net savings. It refers users to the Impact Evaluation Framework for Technology Deployment Programs for more extensive treatment of market effects evaluation, and for the evaluation of programs relying mostly or exclusively on indirect effects, such as market transformation programs and education or training programs. All programs are carried out in a larger structural context—that is, in the real world of society, the economy, and markets. Off the drawing board and in the real world, many factors unrelated to the program and beyond the control of program administrators can affect program outcomes. The technical guidance offered in Model Energy Efficiency Program Impact Evaluation Guide is likely to result in a more robust evaluation when implemented in the context of a clear understanding of the linkages between program activities and outcomes as well as the other factors that could affect energy savings, demand savings, and other potential program outcomes. Whenever possible, program managers and evaluators should strive to develop and communicate a clear understanding of these factors and linkages as part of program and evaluation planning. International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP) The IPMVP, a product of the Efficiency Valuation Organization, is a set of framework documents used to develop strategies and plans for quantifying energy and water savings at the project level—that is, in individual facilities or groups of facilities—for retrofits and new construction. This document is referred to Model Energy-Efficiency Program Impact Evaluation Guide described above, which explains the relevance of the IPMVP to efficiency programs and when to use each of its parts. The IPMVP describes appropriate approaches to selecting facilities for measurement and verification (M&V); measuring and verifying equipment installation and usage; monitoring indoor environmental quality under different circumstances; and addressing how to quantify avoided emissions from facilities and projects. National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency The National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency is a joint effort of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of Energy, and more than 80 energy, environmental, and other organizations. Its goal to create a sustainable, aggressive national commitment to energy efficiency through gas and electric utilities, utility regulators, and partner organizations. Action Plan participants are identifying key barriers limiting greater U.S. investment in energy efficiency, and developing and documenting sound business practices for removing these barriers. The Action Plan's initial report identifies key barriers to limiting greater investment in energy efficiency and reviews sound business practices for removing these barriers, detailing findings and outlining recommendations and options for overcoming them. In addition to the Model Energy Efficiency Program Impact Evaluation Guide discussed above, the Action Plan is producing a series of documents to help guide regulators and program administrators in planning for and evaluating energy efficiency as a resource. These include two documents useful for planning energy-efficiency portfolios and programs, the Guide for Conducting Energy-Efficiency Potential Studies and Guide to Resource Planning with Energy Efficiency. For a comprehensive list of Action Plan guides and papers, go to http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-programs/napee/resources/guides.html. U.S. DOE Evaluation Publications In addition to the Impact Evaluation Framework for Technology Deployment Programs described above, there is a twelve page overview and an application example designed to help in learning how to implement the approach described in this document. Also on the DOE website are:
The Evaluation Protocols are the official document that evaluation professionals are to rely upon when planning and conducting their evaluation efforts for California programs. Ontario Power Authority Evaluation Framework & Protocols The Ontario Power Authority (OPA) is in the process of finalizing an evaluation framework, protocols, and other related guidance documents for conducting energy efficiency program evaluation of OPA programs. The evaluation framework is to provide the background for a consistent and systematic methodology for tracking, reporting and evaluating the impacts and effectiveness of Conservation programs funded by the OPA. New England Forward Capacity Market M&V Manual As part of the newly formed wholesale capacity market in New England, or Forward Capacity Market (FCM), demand resources, including energy efficiency, load management, DG, real-time demand response, and real-time emergency generation, can compete alongside supply resources in the annual auctions. The New England Independent System Operator (ISO-NE) has developed an M&V Manual for demand resources which sets forth the standards that demand resource providers must meet in order to qualify their resources and receive capacity payments during the commitment period. California Demand Response Evaluation The California Public Utilities Commission has posted a document that is expected to form the basis of the state's protocols on load impact estimation for demand response. This document is helpful in outlining issues regarding the evaluation of demand response programs, and also discusses forecasting the effects of demand response for program planning. It should be available for downloading in September. Check the proceedings section of the California Public Utilities Commission's website for this document. (Refer to Rulemaking 07-01-041.)
This document was developed with input from the Steve Schiller of Schiller Consulting, author of the Model Energy Efficiency Program Impact Evaluation Guide, and John Reed of Innovologie and Ed Vine of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, two co-authors of the Impact Evaluation Framework for Technology Deployment Programs [1] Reed, J., Jordan, G. and E. Vine. 2007. Impact Eval Framework for Technology Deployment Programs. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Page iv. |
© 2000-2009, Consortium for Energy Efficiency, Inc.
http://www.cee1.org
98 North Washington St., Suite 101, Boston MA 02114-1918
617-589-3949
fax 617-589-3948
All rights reserved. Terms and conditions for use of this Web site.
Send comments about this site to our Webmaster